http://SaturnianCosmology.Org/ mirrored file For complete access to all the files of this collection see http://SaturnianCosmology.org/search.php ========================================================== Forgotten facts and real situation in science ------------------------------------------------------------------------ /Arguments against a blunder:/ 1). Earliest researchers determined real direction of motion of the Tunguska meteoroid before explosion as "from South to North" (L.A.Kulik[1922], A.V.Voznesensky[1925], I.M.Suslov[1925], I.S.Astapovich[1933]). But some modern scientists changed this direction without any serious arguments. They assumed that the axial symmetry of forest fall so-colled "butterfly" linked with direction of motion. This assumption is a blunder. Direction of axis of simmetry is in good agreement with perpendicular to declination of magnetic field of Earth in Tunguska region. This fact indicates an interaction between plasma of explosion and magnetic field of Earth. But real direction of motion of meteoroid before explosion was "from South to North". 2). Such blunder became possible because visible trajectory of the Tunguska meteorite really was curved. Witnesses from Lena river said that meteorite flew from East to West. But witnesses from Angara river determined direction of motion as "from South to North". We can reconstruct real form of trajectory because we have witness account from the town Kondrashino. V.K.Penigin from the town Kondrashino really saw curved visible form of trajectory. The picture presented below show us the view from the town Kondrashino (drawing by A.E.Zlobin [1996] according to account of V.K.Penigin). 3). We know, that the Tunguska meteorite fell millions of trees. Professor I.S.Astapovich informed us about two kinds of great forest fall [1948]. Today one of them has a title of "butterfly." Another forest fall has a title of "eastern". It is possible that ballistic shock wave influence from concave side of trajectory can explain "eastern" forest fall location. The picture presented below show us curved form of trajectory of the Tunguska meteorite (drawing by A.E.Zlobin, 1989) and presumable location of forest fall "eastern" (I.S.Astapovich, 1948). 4). Accurate structure of forest fall so-colled "butterfly" was obtained by V.G.Fast[1976]. Some modern scientists explained "wings" of "butterfly" as a result of ballistic shock wave influence. But this explanation is a blunder too. "Butterfly" really contain the track of ballistic shock wave. But it is not "wings" of "butterfly". Real track of ballistic shock wave is anomaly of the forest fall so-called "horseshoe" in South region of "butterfly" (A.E.Zlobin, 1996). Such "horseshoes" are well-known structures in modern gas dynamics. The form of "horseshoe" is a result of section of ballistic shock wave cone. This "horseshoe" is a confirmation of real direction of motion "from South to North" (I.S.Astapovich, 1933). But "butterfly" and it's "wings" is a result of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) nature of explosion. 5). The Tunguska meteorite burnt branches of trees. Thin structure of burn was determined by V.A.Vorobyov and D.V.Djomin [1976]. Thin structure of burn has a marked ridge directed from South to North. This is another confirmation of "South-North" direction of motion. 6). Heat influence of the Tunguska fire-ball changed characteristics of the thermoluminescence of quartz (B.V.Vasilenko, D.V.Djomin, V.K.Zhuravlyov, 1967), (B.F.Bidjukov, 1988), (B.F.Bidjukov, V.O.Krasavchikov, V.A.Razum, 1990). A.E.Zlobin [1989,1997] estimated heat impulse of Tunguska explosion as J = 3 - 7 cal/sm2. This result was obtained with taken into consideration burn of trees and heating of quartz. But in addition, the Tunguska fire-ball burnt skin of a man from Vanovara. If J = 3 - 7 cal/cm2 then fire-ball really flew over Vanavara. It was possible only in case of "South-North" direction of motion before explosion. Taken into consideration these arguments we must to start our investigations from the very beginning. We must to turn down incorrect variant of trajectory (from East to West), to agree with final variant of trajectory of professor I.S.Astapovich (from South to North) and recognize mahnetohydrodynamic nature of cumulative explosion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------