mirrored file at http://SaturnianCosmology.Org/ For complete access to all the files of this collection see http://SaturnianCosmology.org/search.php ========================================================== The anomaly of the Cydonia discovery on Mars Copyright Ted Holden The structures which the Viking probe found in the region of Mars named Cydonia are one of the four big anomalies, for which standard science has no answers. Consider the planet Mars, and the two versions of a history for our solar system which we have been hearing about. Given the standard version, Mars should simply never have been habitable: always too cold, too little air and, as far as any possibility of humans ever have gotten there in prehistoric times, always too far away. Given standard versions of history for our system, if Mars ever HAD been inhabited, you'd figure it to be by some entirely different life form than us, since we have only arrived at the power to GET to Mars very recently, and there is zero reason to think we may have ever been there during any of what we regard as prehistory. The last thing you'd ever expect to find there would be somebody who looked even remotely like us. That's given standard versions of everything. Given David Talbott's reconstruction of the Saturn Hypothesis, you've got Mars sitting right over top of Earth under Saturn, certainly warm enough to be habitable since you have to assume that we drew warmth from Saturn and not from the sun at that time, and possibly with an atmosphere. Basically, given standard theories, it would come as an enormous shock to find any evidence of humans ever having been on Mars. Given Talbott's theory, it would come only as a mild surprise. It still wouldn't have been easy to get to Mars under such conditions, but it would have been one hell of a lot easier than it is now. There are a few simple principles to keep in mind when listening to any discussion of space aliens, outside of sci-fi movies: 1. 99.999x% of anything you ever hear is BS. 2. The one time you ever do hear anything real, you won't believe it (because of all of the BS in 1.) 3. If anything interesting ever should turn up from all of the billions of dollars spent on space research, you can count on hearing it from NASA last. The first time I ever saw the images I have in mind, I figured them to be fruit of the National Inquirer's art department, much like the good picture of the old recneck with his 30-30 and the 50 lb. grasshopper ("Ah HAD'ta shoot im', th' varmint was justa eatin' up all ma' wheat..."). That is clearly not the case. Either these images represent a gigantic fraud on the part of a major government agency (NASA), or the Viking mission actually did find remains, and collosal ones, of an antique civilization on Mars. This is getting to be fairly common knowledge on the internet now. Versions of these images may be had from several sites on the internet: * [1]The total package * [2]The Cydonia Zone * [3]Face on Mars * [4]Mars Photo Gallery * [5]The Mars/Earth Connection * [6]Joe Schembrie's Cydonia Page (impact of Cydonia findings on evolution). * [7]French Astro Server at Rennes University What appears in these images, for the uninitiated, is the ruins of a complex involving gigantic pyramids as well as one more complex structure and, about 15 km off from the structure, a humanoid face atop a bevaled base, which appears to be over a mile long and, judging merely from the shadow which the entire thing casts, 1000' high or more. Nearby, and visible in other Viking photographs is a gigantic five-sided pyramid with buttressed corners which has been named "D&M" after its doscoverers, Molenaar and DiPietro. The two long sides of this pyramid are over a mile long. This topic has come up on PBS more than once recently, and has appeared in numerous magazines. I recently caught the tail end of a discussion on PBS in which some fairly serious sounding people were having a great deal to say about NASA, none of it good. NASA was apparently publically committed to putting the satellite with the good camera over that region this last year and, of course, that is the satellite they claim to have lost. Some into conspiracy theories could have a whole lot of fun with this one. The book to read as far as I know is Richard Hoagland's "Monuments of Mars". The enhanced pictures of the face monument appear to me to be not terribly different from one of Jay Matternes' reconstructions of Neanderthals. Again, given standard theories, that's just crazy. Given the Saturn hypothesis, it's about what you might anticipate, and only indicates that either some very early Egyptian culture or some not too remote predacessor of it was multi-planetary. At first glance, it would seem inconceivable that NASA hasn't been shouting this to the rooftops since 1976, or that any other project has had any priority at all in the meantime. The problem is that the whole thing blows their cosmology. You can't build anything remotely like the Cydonia complex with space-suits on; the planet has to be habitable to build Cydonia. Thre is, however, no imaginable way in which Mars could have been habitable recently, given standard theory and so, the scientists next ask what happens if they attempt to use time as a magic-wand as the evolution crowd does, and move the entire business back a couple of million or a couple of hundred million years ago. What that does, of course, (since the image on the pedestal is clearly that of a humanoid ancestor and not that of an unrelated space alien) is to force the face on that pedestal base to be that of an Australopithicus or a homo-erectus, basically a monkey. The astronomers obviously do not care to deal with that and, hence, generally claim that the whole thing is imaginary, and that the structures in the images are simply tricks of lighting and natural formations. The tale told by the images themselves, however, does not allow for that; the face monument and the odd building with the triangular enclosed space in particular, will be created by wind and chance on about the day that hell freezes over. Again, the only theory which truly explains anything here is the new catastrophism. An idea of [8]How a humanoid ancestor might have gotten to Mars is provided in Alfred DeGrazia and Earl Milton's Solaria Binaria. _________________________________________________________________ References 1. http://www.bemyguest.com/mars 2. http://www.cydonia.org/zone.html 3. http://www.psrw.com/~markc/Other/mars/mars.html 4. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/photo_gallery/PhotoGallery-Mars.html 5. http://www.pacifier.com/~dfiler/mars.html 6. http://home.navisoft.com/cydonia/cydonia.htm 7. http://www.univ-rennes1.fr/ASTRO/astro11e.html 8. http://bearfabrique.org/Solarsys/solbin/solbin.html