mirrored file at http://SaturnianCosmology.Org/ For complete access to all the files of this collection see http://SaturnianCosmology.org/search.php ========================================================== _AAT _Most authorities on Human Evolution agree that the last common ancestor of Chimpanzees, Gorillas and Human Beings lived in Africa at the most 8 million years ago. There is much agreement too that it was a change to a drier climate in East Africa that began to lead the ancestors of hominids down a different evolutionary path from other apes. Clearly something happened to our ancestors that was very [1]different from their in that time. For most of the last century the big assumption has been that this climatic change caused hominids to move to a drier, more open, grassy habitat. It is not clear how anyone could have arrived at the conclusion that apes would have ventured out onto alien, dry, open grassland when they could have stayed in smaller concentrations of woodland by rivers and lakes but wherever the idea came from originally, it seems to have become firmly stuck. There is an alternative view, curiously overlooked, that contests this assumption. The so-called Aquatic Ape Hypothesis (AAH) has many different forms and proponents, but basically argues that the best way of explaining many human features is to see them as aquatic not savannah adaptations. There is a large degree of controversy surrounding the AAH. Many anthropologists disagree with it entirely and even its proponents differ greatly in how perceive the aquatic phase happened. One of the most popular new ways of looking at evolution is the study of cladistics, where evolutionary species are organised into clades (kind-of like family trees) based on traits that are derived or conserved. Curiously this technique does not seem to have been used when considering the AAH. [2]Here, I make a very basic start. Here some of the theories are reviewed and I put forward my own [3]Aquatic Hybrid Ape Hypothesis for public scrutiny. _Wading origin for Bipedalism _In particular I think that one of the strongest arguments for the AAH is its explanation of bipedalism. The idea that it began in apes that were adapted to wading is still not very popular and is hardly mentioned even as a possibility in orthodox text books. But I think this will change. The evidence for it is growing all the time (see my [4]article here or my MSc [5]thesis Bipedal Wading in Hominoidae Past and Present). Also some big names are beginning to think the same way. Chris Stringer wrote as much in a student's guide to human evolution in [6]1976 and stated the same thing in a public [7]question at Birkbeck College at the end of 2000. Also in the recent BBC documentary "Gorilla" David Attenborough, narrating whilst footage of Western Lowland Gorillas were wading bipedally across stretches of water asked "was this how we first started walking?" _Alister Hardy _Here you'll find a short biography about the person most people credit with the theory: [8]Sir Alister Hardy FRS. Although he was not the first to publish material claiming a more aquatic past for humans (Max [9]Westenhöfer, a German scientist did that in 1942, in Berlin) he was the first to do so in the English language. Neither Hardy nor Westenhöffer knew of each other's ideas when they published but Hardy claims to have first thought of the idea back in 1930. Hardy wrote about the theory first in March 1960 in New Scientist. You can read the actual article for yourself [10]here. _Valkenburg Conference_ One of the myths surrounding the AAH is that is has been dismissed or refuted by the academic establishment. If anyone ever infers this they are probably referring to the Valkenburg conference which was held in the Dutch town of that name in 1987. The published proceedings from it : [11]The Aquatic Ape: Fact or Fiction remain the only serious academic work taking the theory seriously in 42 years. The conference concluded against the AAH but judge for yourself why you think that was. _Biochemical/Dietary Evidence_ Another body of workers who are advocates of a more aquatic past for our ancestors than the prevailing view are those biochemists and dieticians who are convinced that the modern human need for certain essential fatty acids (EFA), especially in brain growth is evidence that hominids must have evolved in places rich in those substances. Two that seem to be particularly important, Docosahexanoic Acid (DHA) and Arachidonic Acid (AA), are found most commonly in aquatic foods. The arguments of the people promoting this theory are shown [12]here. [13][LINK] [14][LINK] [15][LINK] [16][LINK] [17][LINK] [18][LINK] [19][LINK] [20][LINK] [21][LINK] [22][LINK] [23][LINK] References 1. http://www.riverapes.com/AHAH/ComparativeBiology/ChimpsandHumans.htm 2. http://www.riverapes.com/AHAH/ComparativeBiology/derived_aquatic_traits.htm 3. http://www.riverapes.com/AHAH/Index.htm 4. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/AATheories/Wading/why_did_we_start_walking.htm 5. http://www.riverapes.com/Me/Work/BipedalismThesis.htm 6. http://www.riverapes.com/HEvol/references.htm#Stringer 1976 7. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/AATheories/Wading/HowAboutWading.htm 8. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/Hardy/Hardy.htm 9. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT/files/Max-WestenhEUR%F6fer.htm 10. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/Hardy/HardyPage1.htm 11. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/FoF/FactOrFiction.htm 12. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/EFA 13. http://www.riverapes.com/AHAH/ComparativeBiology/ChimpsandHumans.htm 14. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT/files/Max-WestenhEUR%F6fer.htm 15. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/Hardy/Hardy.htm 16. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT/files/Elaine-Morgan.htm 17. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/EFA/EFA.htm 18. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/MV/Verhaegen.htm 19. http://www.riverapes.com/AHAH/ComparativeBiology/derived_aquatic_traits.htm 20. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/FoF/FactOrFiction.htm 21. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/AATheories/Wading/why_did_we_start_walking.htm 22. http://www.riverapes.com/AHAH/Index.htm 23. http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/Arguments/index.htm