by davesmith_au » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:20 pm

Mike I know it's difficult to supress all the natural questions which
first arise when giving thought to the Saturn theory, but on the face of
it it appears such a preposterous proposition that it needs careful
explaining to be given any consideration at all.

Unfortunately every time we've entertained forum discussion of the theory,
others have quickly jumped in with their "superior understanding" or a
"better theory" of their own, which quickly denegrates proper discussion
of the theory concerned.

I would ask for patience - which I know we've asked for plenty of times
before - as Dave Talbott is very close to having finished the first
segment of Symbols of an Alien Sky. This has been developed from the
rough-cut versions posted to You-Tube with changes according to the
feedback he has received.

The questions you ask may or may not even be answered to any degree yet,
and until people understand the full nature of the work, open discussion
of those sorts of questions leads quickly into speculation which is far
removed from any scientific or forensic methodology, and thus the impact
or implications of the theory are lost amongst the flood of "my theory is
... " which inevitably follows.

For those who have a genuine interest in knowing more about the theory,
first wait until the Symbols (part 1) is published, and then perhaps some
properly constrained discussion may be entertained. And then also people
will be able to see why the Saturn theory is linked so explicitly with
Electric Universe theory.

Cheers, Dave.(smith)