Thunderbolts Forum
For discussion of Electric Universe and Plasma Cosmology
Skip to content <#start_here>
* Board index <./index.php> *‹* The Human Question <./viewforum.php?f=9>
* Change font size <#>
* FAQ <./faq.php>
* Register <./ucp.php?mode=register>
* Login <./ucp.php?mode=login>
Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock?
<./viewtopic.php?f=9&t=1534&start=0>
What is a human being? What is life? Can science give us reliable
answers to such questions? The electricity of life. The meaning of human
consciousness. Are we alone? Are the traditional contests between
science and religion still relevant? Does the word "spirit" still hold
meaning today?
Forum rules
Post a reply <./posting.php?mode=reply&f=9&t=1534>
First unread post <#unread> • 8 posts • Page *1* of *1*
Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18022>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18022#p18022>by *goodsamaritan
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=600>* » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:50 am
I just viewed several Graham Hancock videos about his quest to find a
lost global civilization up to 10,500 BC.
Part 1 of this 16 part video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KUVix96NsY
Quest for the lost civilization
His official website http://www.grahamhancock.com/
My question is, have the Thunderbolts founders been in touch with Graham
Hancock?
Seems like a good match.
goodsamaritan <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=600>
*Posts:* 10
*Joined:* Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:01 am
* E-mail goodsamaritan <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=600>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18045>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18045#p18045>by *Plasmatic
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56>* » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:23 pm
The only thing they really have in common is that there both seeking
alternative answers to the SM of orthodox assumption in different fields.
For instance the book SUPERNATURAL would not have been written if he
understood the past electrodynamic interactions that explain the
patterns he is pointing at. I think the biggest differences are in the
over reliance on precession as the secret cipher of all ancient peoples.
"Logic is the art of non-contradictory identification"......" I am
therefore Ill think"
Ayn Rand
Plasmatic <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56>
*Posts:* 652
*Joined:* Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:14 pm
* E-mail Plasmatic <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=56>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18047>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18047#p18047>by *goodsamaritan
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=600>* » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:41 pm
I'm thinking of Graham Hancock had a better idea of the Electric
Universe he could make adjustments.
goodsamaritan <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=600>
*Posts:* 10
*Joined:* Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:01 am
* E-mail goodsamaritan <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=600>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18057>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18057#p18057>by *StevenJay
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=261>* » Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:50 am
goodsamaritan wrote:I'm thinking of Graham Hancock had a better idea
of the Electric Universe he could make adjustments.
Same goes for Weidner, Wilcock, Hoagland, Cremo, Childress (to list but
a few), as well as, pretty much the entire UFO community. I have
corresponded with many of these people over the years, encouraging them
to at least check out the EU model, as it may hold answers to many of
the mysteries (or at least broaden the field of possible considerations)
they have encountered over the course of their individual areas of
passion and research. Incredibly, it would appear that none of those I
have written to considers it to be a worthwhile endeavor. I find it to
be really frustrating to see so many intelligent people holding so many
different pieces of the puzzle, and yet they don't seem to want to
communicate with each other and share what they've found.
Could that possibly be due to the same
money/status/credibility/security-thing that keeps so many mainstream
researchers locked into a particular consensus paradigm? Even though
it's already happening in certain circles, I feel that the concept of
interdisciplinary study needs to be expanded, and its importance fully
realized, at this juncture in the human experience. Otherwise, all of
the seemingly disparate bits of inquiry being engaged in all over the
world amount to little more than a group of Whirling Dervishes, each
spinning blissfully in his own private universe. . . wondering.
StevenJay <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=261>
*Posts:* 309
*Joined:* Thu May 01, 2008 11:02 am
*Location:* Sedona, Arizona
* E-mail StevenJay <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=261>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18058>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18058#p18058>by *StevenJay
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=261>* » Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:35 am
Plasmatic wrote:For instance the book SUPERNATURAL would not have
been written if he understood the past electrodynamic interactions
that explain the patterns he is pointing at. I think the biggest
differences are in the over reliance on precession as the secret
cipher of all ancient peoples.
Ever since I was first exposed to (and immediately resonated with)
David's reconstructive work on the Saturn Myth, my curiosity has been
voracious! Quite often I find myself viewing various aspects of the
world around us, which we have come to accept as being unquestioningly
solid, through the SM filter. Your mentioning of over-reliance on
precession set those wheels a spinnin' again.
IF Talbott's version of the Saturn Myth is true, at least for the most
part, then Earth's current orientation to the heavens is only some -
what - 5,000 to 13,000 years old? If so, then we've yet to experience
more than half of a single precessional "cycle." And, since there are no
guarantees that the current planetary orientation will continue,
uninterrupted, for another 13k years, why should anyone consider
"precession" to be any more than just another projected theory based on
Newtonian clockwork cosmology? I mean, it's entirely possible that it's
merely a "temporary" phenomenon. So, yeah, I think it's being way
over-rated.
StevenJay <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=261>
*Posts:* 309
*Joined:* Thu May 01, 2008 11:02 am
*Location:* Sedona, Arizona
* E-mail StevenJay <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=261>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18075>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18075#p18075>by *mague
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=262>* » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:57 am
StevenJay wrote:
IF Talbott's version of the Saturn Myth is true, at least for the
most part, then Earth's current orientation to the heavens is only
some - what - 5,000 to 13,000 years old? If so, then we've yet to
experience more than half of a single precessional "cycle." And,
since there are no guarantees that the current planetary orientation
will continue, uninterrupted, for another 13k years, why should
anyone consider "precession" to be any more than just another
projected theory based on Newtonian clockwork cosmology? I mean,
it's entirely possible that it's merely a "temporary" phenomenon.
So, yeah, I think it's being way over-rated.
Of course there is no guarantee for endless uninterrupted cycles. But
this isnt Newtons imagination of a clockwork cosmos. This was observed
by many other people.
1955 Maria Sabina
told R. Gordon Wasson
about her visions. She saw wheels turning within wheels in the sky. She
was a humble woman and most probably never heared about Newton. I am not
sure, but i doubt she ever had been to any school. Unfortunately it
seems this text is no longer on the net. But soem still call her the
clock woman.
The wheels have been sacred in america for a while. The medicine wheel
for example. Even mainstream archeology tells us that maya knew the
wheel. They builded roads, but never carts. They only used wheels for
child toys and as goal for their sacred ball game.
Otherwise i agree. People should compare their knowledge. Scientists mix
different pictures of visible light, radio, infrared, whatever to gain a
better picture. Alternative researchers should do the same.
mague <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=262>
*Posts:* 692
*Joined:* Fri May 02, 2008 2:44 am
* E-mail mague <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=262>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18077>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18077#p18077>by *kevin
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=132>* » Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:20 am
goodsamaritan,
I enjoyed those youtube clips, and find the content revealing, the
archaeological content that is.
I find Mr Hancocks assumptions annoying, and all the time He is blasting
others over making assumptions?
I agree that a meeting of many disciplins is needed, and those with an
electrical understanding have been too absent for too long.
Hancocks reliance on visual sight alignments is pathetic, imho.
The ancient sites will all be aligned to the lattice grid, I have
checked ceaselessly everyone I can get to here and in France, there is
no doubt what so ever by my research that it is the manipulation of a
dual flowing aether that is their reason for construction, the
alignments are not visual at all, but of course do co-incide with
extreme positions of planets etc in the galaxy, the pathways involved
are not circuler, they are spiral, and those spiral pathways are to
scale and all symbiotic to each other, our vision is limited and gives
illusions.
The most telling part of his clips was at Angkor wat, where the bridge
clearly shows the churning of the ocean of universe, a duality of
spirals where the ocean is moving, NOT the FIXED matter created in that
ocean, and any moving ocean produces potentials.
Kevin
kevin <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=132>
*Posts:* 688
*Joined:* Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am
* E-mail kevin <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=132>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Will Thunderbolts work with Graham Hancock? <#p18174>
New post <./viewtopic.php?p=18174#p18174>by *JohnMT
<./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=686>* » Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:39 am
goodsamaritan wrote:
I'm thinking of Graham Hancock had a better idea of the Electric
Universe he could make adjustments.
I'm sure Graham Hancock (GH) does have a pretty good idea about the
Electric Universe principles etc.
I've been posting on his website in defence of this very same subject,
in most of its forms, including some of my own ideas too, for the past
six or seven years!
So he must have read at least some of these posts.
However, I don't know GH's opinions and views on the EU, though I would
suspect he is basically mainstream orientated, believing for instance
that the last Ice Age terminated some 12,500 years ago (or thereabouts).
Though many aspects of the EU hypothesis have been discussed,
unfortunately there are not that many adherents.
Anyway, in my opinion, the GH Website is worthy of a visit, there are
some really good thinkers there on many related subjects.
Perhaps some of you guys might join and lend some support when at times
the going gets tough (though I can usually hold my own).
The discussion Board is quite heavily moderated, so it is best not to
get too emotional when staking one's claim (as I have mistakenly done in
the past)
Cheers
John
JohnMT <./memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=686>
*Posts:* 53
*Joined:* Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:52 am
* E-mail JohnMT <./memberlist.php?mode=email&u=686>
Top <#wrap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Display posts from previous: Sort by
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply <./posting.php?mode=reply&f=9&t=1534>
8 posts • Page *1* of *1*
Return to The Human Question <./viewforum.php?f=9>
Jump to:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
* Board index <./index.php>
* The team <./memberlist.php?mode=leaders> • Delete all board
cookies <./ucp.php?mode=delete_cookies> • All times are UTC - 8
hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB
Group